首页> 外文OA文献 >Pipes, Wires, and Bicycles: Rails-to-Trails, Utility Licenses, and the Shifting Scope of Railroad Easements from the Nineteenth to the Twenty-First Centuries
【2h】

Pipes, Wires, and Bicycles: Rails-to-Trails, Utility Licenses, and the Shifting Scope of Railroad Easements from the Nineteenth to the Twenty-First Centuries

机译:管道,电线和自行车:轨到轨,公用事业许可证,以及铁路建设从19世纪到21世纪的转变范围

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This Article responds to a series of class action suits filed against railroads, telecommunication companies, and the federal government claiming that once railroads abandon their corridors, all property rights shift to adjacent landowners. This Article reviews the state law on this matter and offers a theory of how courts should handle these cases. After discussing the history of nineteenth-century railroad land acquisition practices, we analyze the scope of the easement limited for railroad purposes. We then discuss the role abandonment plays in affecting the rights of third party users of these corridors as well as successor trail owners. We conclude with a theory of railroad easements that interprets the railroad\u27s powers based on the public participation that helped create and establish these corridors and the tenuous claims of adjacent landowners.
机译:本条是对针对铁路,电信公司和联邦政府的一系列集体诉讼的回应,该诉讼称,一旦铁路放弃其走廊,所有财产权就会转移给相邻的土地所有者。本文回顾了有关此事的州法律,并提供了有关法院应如何处理这些案件的理论。在讨论了19世纪铁路土地征用实践的历史之后,我们分析了用于铁路目的的地役权范围。然后,我们讨论放弃在影响这些通道的第三方用户以及后续路径所有者的权利中所起的作用。我们以铁路地役权理论作为结尾,该理论根据公众参与来解释铁路的权力,公众参与帮助建立和建立了这些走廊以及相邻土地所有者的脆弱主张。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号